People v. Reeb
Opinion of the Court
The court erred in denying defendant’s application on the ground that the two violent felony offenses fall within the definition of “exclusion offense” because they were committed within the 10-year period preceding the instant controlled substance offense for which defendant seeks resentencing. The phrase “within the preceding ten years” in CPL 440.46 (5) does not refer to the period between the previous felonies and the present felony but, rather, it refers to the 10-year period preceding the date of filing of the application for resentencing (see People v Hill, 82 AD3d 77 [2011]; People v Sosa, 81 AD3d 464 [2011]). The record, however, supports the People’s contention that, taking into account the time during which defendant was incarcerated between the previous felonies and the present felony, defendant’s application was premature (see CPL 440.46 [5] [a]), and thus the application was properly denied. Present— Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Garni, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.