Oliver v. Fischer
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of DiStefano v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- JONES, LOVELLE G. v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- MEDINA, JOSE v. FISCHER, BRIAN (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- WALTON, SAMUEL v. COLVIN, JOHN (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- GRAY, DEVIN v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Medina v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Medina v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Jones v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Jones v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Gray v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Gray v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Walton v. Colvin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- SPEARS, TREVOR v. FISCHER, BRIAN (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Spears v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Spears v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination, following a tier III hearing, that he violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [weapon possession]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who wrote it and the photographs of the shanks found in a light fixture, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 (see generally Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966 [1990]; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 140 [1985]). Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Lindley and Gofski, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.