In re Ameena C.
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Cevon W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- In re Cevon W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Matter of K.V. v. M.K.V. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- In re Ni'Kia C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- In re Ni'Kia C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- In re Jacob H. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The agency demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent neglected her two older children by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on them (see Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1 [1985]; Matter of Alex R. [Maria R.], 81 AD3d 463 [2011]). The caseworker testified that the two children told her that respondent struck them both with a broomstick and prodded one child’s ear with it, and punched the other child and rammed her head through a wall. The caseworker testified further that she observed bruises on both children, including a swollen arm and scabbed ear on one child, and a large hole in the wall of the family home. The children’s hearsay statements to the caseworker were admissible, because they were corroborated by the caseworker’s observations (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 118 [1987]; Alex R., 81 AD3d at 463).
By establishing that respondent neglected two of the children by using excessive corporal punishment on them, petitioner demonstrated respondent’s derivative neglect of the other two children (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]; Matter of Terrell H., 197 AD2d 372 [1993]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.