DeLorenzo v. Gabbino Pizza Corp.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- State of New York Mtge. Agency v. Braun (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Quevedo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- OneWest Bank FSB v. Perla (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- Komanicky v. Contractor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Navarrete v. Metro PCS (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Waggaman v. Vernon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- ONTARIO SQUARE REALTY CORP. v. LAPLANT, DONNA (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Ontario Square Realty Corp. v. LaPlant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Ontario Square Realty Corp. v. LaPlant (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Lee v. Colley Group McMontebello, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, West-
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On October 16, 2006, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when she slipped and fell on a slippery substance in a pizzeria owned by the defendant. In January 2009, the plaintiff commenced this action by filing a summons and complaint with the Westchester County Clerk.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff failed to comply with CPLR 306-b, as she failed to effect service upon the defendant within the 120-day period allowed by that statute (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101 [2001]; Calloway v Wells, 79 AD3d 786 [2010]; Bumpus v New York City Tr. Auth., 66 AD3d 26 [2009]). To the extent that the plaintiff attempted to informally seek leave to effect late service of the original summons and complaint upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 306-b, that affirmative relief should have been sought in a notice of cross motion to the Supreme Court (see Rinaldi v Rochford, 11 AD3d 720 [2010]) and, in any event, the plaintiff did not demonstrate the existence of facts that would support the granting of such relief (see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]; Calloway v Wells, 79 AD3d at 787; Redman v South Is. Orthopaedic Group, P.C., 78 AD3d 1147 [2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 707 [2011]; Rinaldi v Rochford, 11 AD3d at 720).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b. Skelos, J.P., Eng, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.