Canady v. Binette
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Maurice E. Strobridge, J.H.O.), entered March 19, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted the petition for leave to relocate to Louisiana.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted petitioner mother permission for the parties’ child to relocate with her to Louisiana. We affirm. We agree with Family Court that the mother met her burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed relocation is in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Cynthia L.C. v James L.S., 30 AD3d 1085 [2006]).
The father contends that the mother’s petition should have been denied because his financial circumstances preclude him from traveling to Louisiana to visit the child. We reject that contention. The father pays minimal child support, leaving the mother as the only financial source for the child’s health care, child care, and education. The mother’s income potential was limited in the states closest to New York for various reasons,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.