Buccino v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Russo v. Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Brande v. City of White Plains (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Brande v. City of White Plains (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Grizzell v. JQ Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Grizzell v. JQ Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Wachspress v. Central Parking System of New York, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Wachspress v. Central Parking System of New York, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 13, 2010, which granted the City defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff regularly bicycled to his job at the New York piers, employing one route. The court correctly found, as a matter of law, that a speed bump on the 20-foot-wide roadway at the entrance to Pier 94, coupled with a car parked near the speed bump, which car plaintiff had seen in the same location many times before, did not constitute a dangerous condition. The speed bump and the legally parked car — which left at leást 10 feet for vehicles to pass through — were “plainly observable and did not pose any danger to someone making reasonable use of his or her senses” (Rivera v City of New York, 57 AD3d 281, 282 [2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.