White v. Fischer
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Bouton v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Reese v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Reese v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Clark v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Clark v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Faraldo v. Bezio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Beresford Hall v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Beresford Hall v. Venettozzi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Mobayed v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After his urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use. He was found guilty after a tier III disciplinary hearing and, when the determination was upheld on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, positive test results and testimony from the correction officers who both collected and tested petitioner’s urine sample provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Ellison v Fischer, 79 AD3d 1538, 1538-1539 [2010]; Matter of Coleman v Bezio, 79 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2010]). The clerical error on the chain of custody form was adequately explained when Correction Officer Hopkinson testified that he was going to give petitioner’s urine sample to Correction Officer Streeter for placement in the refrigerator, but instead placed the sample in
Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.