Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Sciammarella v. Manorville Postal Associates

Sciammarella v. Manorville Postal Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided August 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 530; 927 N.Y.2d 798
Sciammarella v. Manorville Postal Associates

Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff Toni Sciammarella, then an employee of the United States Postal Service (hereinafter the Postal Service), allegedly sustained injuries when she fell after stepping into a hole in the parking lot of the premises leased to the Postal Service by the defendant.

“An out-of-possession landlord may not be held liable for injuries occurring on its premises unless it is contractually obligated to perform maintenance and repairs or it has retained control over, the premises” (Salaices v Gar-Ben Assoc., 82 AD3d *531740, 741 [2011]; see Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559, 566-567 [1987]). The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it was an out-of-possession landlord that did not retain control over the premises and was not contractually obligated to maintain or repair the parking lot (see Sanchez v Barnes & Noble, Inc., 59 AD3d 698, 699 [2009]; Yadegar v International Food Mkt., 37 AD3d 595, 596-597 [2007]; Brockington v Brookfield Dev. Corp., 20 AD3d 382, 382-383 [2005]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Lauer v Great S. Bay Seafood Co., 299 AD2d 325, 327 [2002]; Amarante v Village of Tarrytown, 226 AD2d 488 [1996]; see also Pala v D. Braf, Ltd., 284 AD2d 382 [2001]). Mastro, J.E, Angiolillo, Chambers and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.