Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

People v. Pantoja

People v. Pantoja
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided August 2, 2011
87 A.D.3d 555; 927 N.Y.2d 789
People v. Pantoja

Opinion of the Court

*556We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised, nor could he have raised, any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Skelos, J.E, Belen, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.