Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC

Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 4, 2011
88 A.D.3d 452; 930 N.Y.2d 435
Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. v. Stanton Crenshaw Communications, LLC

Opinion of the Court

The stipulation on which defendants rely does not clearly and unambiguously manifest an intent on plaintiffs part to release defendants from future rent obligations under the lease (see Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins. Co., 70 NY2d 966, 968 [1988]; NAB Constr. Corp. v City of New York, 276 AD2d 388 [2000]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Renwick, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.