2281 First Realty, LLC v. Warminster Investors Corp.
Opinion of the Court
The motion court properly determined that the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, which owns property adjacent to plaintiffs property, is not a necessary party to this action (see CPLR 1001; Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki, 100 NY2d 801, 819-821 [2003], cert denied 540 US 1017 [2003]). Since the issue is whether plaintiff has an easement in the gate in the wall between its property and Brecevich’s property, plaintiff can be afforded complete relief without the participation of the Parks Department, and the Parks Department will not be affected by a judgment in this action.
The court also properly declined to dismiss Warminster’s cross claim (see Whitney v Whitney, 57 NY2d 731 [1982]). At the time that defendants Brija and Brecevich moved to dismiss, Warminster had not submitted an answer in the prior action against it and thus had not asserted any counterclaim. Moreover, the court properly directed the parties to advise it of any decisions in the prior action that might affect the cross claim in this action.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.