People v. Fagan
People v. Fagan
88 A.D.3d 465; 930 N.Y.2d 446
Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s evidentiary claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.