People v. Burgess
People v. Burgess
88 A.D.3d 469; 930 N.Y.2d 442
Opinion of the Court
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Defendant may not challenge the voluntariness of his underlying guilty plea on this appeal (see People v Jordan, 16 NY3d 845 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.