Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

People v. Peguero

People v. Peguero
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 25, 2011
88 A.D.3d 589; 931 N.Y.2d 496
People v. Peguero

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The court properly exercised its discretion when it admitted expert testimony concerning circumstances that indicate an intent to sell drugs (see People v Hicks, 2 NY3d 750 [2004]). Defendant did not preserve his claim that the expert improperly opined that defendant was a drug seller, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the testimony was within the scope permitted under Hicks, and that defendant was not prejudiced in any event. *590Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and AbdusSalaam, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.