Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Kendrick v. New York State Department of Correctional Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 18, 2011

88 A.D.3d 881; 931 N.Y.2d 255

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Medina v. Sing Sing Correctional Facility (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*882Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the “Contraband Drug Testing Directive” regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer’s determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (iv) (see Matter of Mills v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033 [2011]; Matter of Maxwell v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1342, 1343 [2010]; Matter of Brown v Selsky, 38 AD3d 657 [2007]; Matter of Rincon v Selsky, 28 AD3d 565 [2006]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.