Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Fleming v. City of New York

Fleming v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 1, 2011
89 A.D.3d 405; 931 N.Y.2d 866
Fleming v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

The trial court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s negligence claims as precluded because that theory of liability was not asserted in the original notice of claim, in which plaintiff asserted that he was injured as a result of an intentional assault by the corrections officer (see Garcia v O’Keefe, 34 AD3d 334, 335 [2006]). By the same token, the court correctly denied plaintiffs motion to add the negligence claims to the notice of claim by amendment under General Municipal Law § 50-e (6). Any amendment that creates a new theory of liability is not within the purview of that provision (see White v New York City Hous. Auth., 288 AD2d 150 [2001]). Concur — Gonzalez, J.E, Tom, Sweeny and Renwick, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.