Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Weisburst v. Dreifus

Weisburst v. Dreifus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 2011
89 A.D.3d 536; 932 N.Y.2d 689
Weisburst v. Dreifus

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The court did not abuse its discretion in finding that defendant’s underlying motion for an emergency stay contained “false charges [against plaintiff] that were expressed by means of a tortured and very partial rendering of the facts that can only have been deliberately crafted to mislead” and was therefore frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see e.g. Rogovin v Rogovin, 27 AD3d 233 [2006]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.