Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Menkes v. Beth Abraham Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 29, 2011

89 A.D.3d 647; 933 N.Y.2d 548

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Schorr v. Schorr (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Schorr v. Schorr (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Financial Structures Ltd. v. UBS AG (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Financial Structures Ltd. v. UBS AG (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in grant*648ing the motion, as plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the information sought from the former director could not be obtained from other sources, such as the nursing home’s own records (see Connolly v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 81 AD3d 530, 531 [2011]; Kooper v Kooper, 74 AD3d 6, 15, 16-17 [2010]). In view of the foregoing, we need not determine whether the disclosure sought is material and necessary. Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.