Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

People v. Lepe

People v. Lepe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 22, 2011
89 A.D.3d 1037; 933 N.Y.2d 571
People v. Lepe

Opinion of the Court

*1038We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.