Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 3, 2011 · Fer
89 A.D.3d 1213; 931 N.Y.2d 916
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Fer Curiam.

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts {see 22 NYCRR part 118). Fetitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Mercure, J.E, Feters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

*1214Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.