People v. Hackett
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Chrisley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- B People v. Griest (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Wilke (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- People v. Maus (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Acosta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- People v. Ferris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- People v. Ridley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- People v. Torres (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- People v. Montufar-Tez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Medina (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Segura (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- BALDWIN, RAOUL, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Baldwin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Baldwin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Manougian (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- MOORE, WILLIAM J., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Moore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Moore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- KING, GREG, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. King (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. King (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- SCOTT, LASHAWN J., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Scott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Scott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court miscalculated his total risk factor score in the risk assessment instrument (RAI), and thus mistakenly determined that he was presumptively a level three risk based on that score. We agree with defendant. In fact, pursuant to the correct total risk factor
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.