Roberts v. Board of Collective Bargaining of the Office of Collective Bargaining
Opinion of the Court
The motion court properly dismissed the petition because petitioner, Executive Director of District Council 37, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, cannot challenge the penalty of dismissal, imposed on union member Zinovy Levitant, in this proceeding. Levitant’s termination from his position with the Human Resources Administration (HRA) was preceded by a February 2, 2007 Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings’ recommendation and report. Levitant’s appeal of HRA’s penalty was dismissed by the Civil Service Commission, and Levitant failed to commence an article 78 proceeding challenging that determination. “The express provisions of Civil Service Law §§ 75 and 76 limit the appealability of a final agency determination to an article 78 proceeding or an appeal to the Civil Service Commission” (City of New York v MacDonald, 239 AD2d 274, 274 [1997]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.