Squitieri v. Squitieri
Opinion of the Court
The court has broad discretion in imputing income to a parent, particularly, where, as here, there is evidence that the parent underreported income (see Ansour v Ansour, 61 AD3d 536 [2009]; Baruch v Blum, 301 AD2d 479 [2003]; Matter of Klein v Klein, 251 AD2d 733, 735 [1998]). Indeed, the husband’s annual income could not be accurately ascertained because of his apparently evasive testimony, and his failure to produce appropriate documentation.
While an award of maintenance is within the court’s discretion (Hughes v Hughes, 79 AD3d 473, 475 [2010]), the court erred in failing to award any maintenance. At the time of the award, the husband was in a clearly superior financial position, and the wife stopped working outside the home so that she could care for the parties’ three children. Moreover, the illness of the parties’ daughter could reasonably interfere with the wife’s obtaining and maintaining gainful employment. As a result, the matter should be remitted for a calculation of such maintenance (see Atweh v Hashem, 284 AD2d 216 [2001]; cf. Ansour at 537).
We have considered the wife’s remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.