Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Katz v. Dotan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 6, 2011

90 A.D.3d 661; 933 N.Y.2d 870

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Matter of Diamond v. Lichaw (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see Family Ct Act § 1118; CELR 5525 [a]; Matter of Remy v Mitchell, 60 AD3d 860 [2009]). The failure to provide necessary transcripts inhibits the Court’s ability to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal (see Matter of *662Rudick v Rudick, 16 AD3d 514 [2005]). In this case, the full record of the proceedings in the Family Court has not been transcribed (see Matter of Davis v Pegues, 266 AD2d 288 [1999]; Matter of Baiko v Baiko, 141 AD2d 635 [1988]).

This appeal must be dismissed, as the papers provided were patently insufficient for the purpose of reviewing the issues the father has raised (see Matter of Remy v Mitchell, 60 AD3d at 860; Matter of Zullo v Hom, 22 AD3d 675, 676 [2005]; Matter of Rudick v Rudick, 16 AD3d at 514). Rivera, J.E, Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.