R. Bertil Peterson v. State
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Matievskaya v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Matter of Snitow v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Matter of Arken v. New York City Dept. of Fin. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c is supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner’s challenge to the administrative determination rests upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the fact-finder to resolve, and we see no basis to overturn the factfinder’s determination (see Matter of Hildreth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 83 AD3d 838 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.