Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 22, 2011
90 A.D.3d 1404; 934 N.Y.2d 727
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

*1405Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Mercure, A.EJ., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.