Thompson v. Cooper
Opinion of the Court
However, the petition and the documentary evidence, including a money judgment in plaintiffs favor against Cooper and state and municipal transfer forms indicating that Imperial paid little or no consideration for the condominium, are sufficient to raise triable issues whether Cooper, who at the time of the transfer was a defendant in plaintiff’s action for money damages, fraudulently conveyed the condominium to Imperial in violation of Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a (see Matter of National Enters., Inc. v Clermont Farm Corp., 46 AD3d 1180, 1182 [2007]). In view of the foregoing, we nostra sponte deem the petition amended to include a claim under Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a (see CPLR 3025 [c]; Gonfiantini v Zino, 184 AD2d 368, 369 [1992]). Concur — Friedman, J.P, Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32726(U).]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.