Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

Maroti v. Hirst

Maroti v. Hirst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 24, 2012
91 A.D.3d 541; 937 N.Y.2d 48
Maroti v. Hirst

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The determination to deny petitioner’s application for a master rigger’s license had a rational basis. The record demonstrates that petitioner failed to present evidence that he gained the requisite qualifying experience under the direct and continuing supervision of a master rigger duly licensed in the City of New York for five of the seven years prior to the filing of the application (see Matter of Auringer v Department of Citywide Admin. Servs. of City of N.Y., 28 AD3d 381 [2006]; Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 28-404.1, 28-404.3.1).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, DeGrasse, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.