People v. Holland
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Franko (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Franko (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Drammeh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Drammeh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; cf. People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). The defendant’s valid waiver of appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentencing court should have considered and determined whether to sentence him as a youthful offender (see People v Billings, 60 AD3d 961, 962 [2009]; People v Valentin, 15 AD3d 424 [2005]; People v Friedlander, 11 AD3d 556 [2004]).
The ineffective assistance of counsel alleged by the defendant did not directly involve the negotiation of his plea of guilty or otherwise affect the voluntariness of the plea. Accordingly, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim (see People v Jones, 89 AD3d 1037 [2011]; People v Sorino, 82 AD3d 911 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Hall, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.