Fox v. Marshall
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hongyan Sun v. Lee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Hausman v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Johnson v. Amadorzabala (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Peterson v. Estate of John Rozansky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Romano v. SLS Residential Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2014)
- Retamozzo v. Quinones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Discovery of medical records regarding a party’s mental or physical condition is permitted when a defendant waives that privilege by affirmatively placing his or her mental or physical condition “in controversy” (CPLR 3121 [a]; see Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d at 286-287; Lombardi v Hall, 5 AD3d 739, 739-
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not err in finding that the defendant Evan Marshall waived the physician-patient privilege with respect to the medical records and other documents relating to a prior criminal proceeding in which he was a defendant that are the subject of the orders appealed from here (see Webdale v North Gen. Hosp., 7 Misc 3d 947, 955 [2005], affd 24 AD3d 153 [2005]; see also Szmania v State of New York, 82 AD3d 1688, 1690 [2011]). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the requests for an in camera review of certain medical records (cf. J.Z. v South Oaks Hosp., 67 AD3d 645 [2009]; Sohan v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 282 AD2d 597 [2001]). Rivera, J.E, Eng, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.