Gallo v. SCG Select Carrier Group, L.P.
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gigauri v. One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Legacy Builders/Developers Corp. v. Hollis Care Group, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Moses v. B & E Lorge Family Trust (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- SARAVULLO, BONNIE J. v. TILLOTSON, HERBERT M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Rivera-Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Rivera-Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Malester v. Rampil (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Malester v. Rampil (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Kent Realty, LLC v. Danica Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Kent Realty, LLC v. Danica Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Breytman v. Olinville Realty (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Breytman v. Olinville Realty (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Jacobs v. Johnston (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Jacobs v. Johnston (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellants timely moved, inter alia, to strike the note of issue within 20 days of its service (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]), and clearly demonstrated that the plaintiffs certificate of readiness contained misstatements concerning the status of discovery. Since the appellants made a clear showing that discovery was not complete and that the case was not ready for trial, the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to strike the note of issue and to compel the plaintiff to appear for a neurological examination (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Brown v Astoria Fed. Sav., 51 AD3d 961, 962 [2008]; Gregory v Ford Motor Credit Co., 298 AD2d 496, 497 [2002]; Drapaniotis v 36-08
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.