Palomini v. Puglisi
Palomini v. Puglisi
91 A.D.3d 736; 936 N.Y.2d 568
Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellants’ motion pursuant to CPDR 3216 to dismiss the complaint as the plaintiff demonstrated a justifiable excuse for her delay in filing a note of issue, as well as the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action (see Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]; Kadyimov v
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.