Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

People v. Rose

People v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 17, 2012
91 A.D.3d 798; 936 N.Y.2d 902
People v. Rose

Opinion of the Court

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.P, Eng, Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.