Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

In re the Claim of Zerrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 5, 2012

91 A.D.3d 1011; 935 N.Y.2d 916

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Matter of Walters (Commissioner of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
Matter of Kanter (Commr. of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
Matter of Franklin (Commr. of Labor) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
MatterofMarkaj[Commr.ofLabor] (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
In re the Claim of Markaj (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
In re the Claim of Markaj (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*1012It is well settled that quitting in response to criticism by a supervisor or in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see Matter of Follett [Commissioner of Labor], 87 AD3d 1233, 1234 [2011]; Matter of Hull [Commissioner of Labor], 77 AD3d 1012, 1013 [2010]; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 674 [2003]; Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 AD2d 949, 950 [1993]). Based upon this record, we find that the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld (see Matter of Seiglar [Commissioner of Labor], 51 AD3d 1118, 1118 [2008]; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d at 674).

Spain, J.E, Lahtinen, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.