Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

Erie County Department of Social Services ex rel. Wiser v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 31, 2012

91 A.D.3d 1327; 937 N.Y.2d 658

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

G., SAVANNA, MTR. OF (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
In re Savanna G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
In re Savanna G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
MANNING, KATHLEEN S. v. SOBOTKA, STANLEY P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
B., CAMERON, MTR. OF (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
Matter of Dench-Layton v. Dench-Layton (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
In re Cameron B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
In re Cameron B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
In re Cameron B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
DANIELS, TRISHA M. v. DAVIS, JUSTIN M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*1328It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the objections to the order of the Support Magistrate entered August 16, 2010 are granted and the motion to vacate the order of the Support Magistrate entered June 19, 2009 is granted, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act based on respondent father’s alleged willful violation of a child support order. The Support Magistrate entered an order in favor of petitioner upon the father’s alleged default. We conclude that Family Court erred in denying the father’s objections to a second order of the Support Magistrate, which denied the motion of the father to vacate the order entered upon his alleged default. The father’s “failure to appear at the fact-finding hearing . . . ‘does not automatically constitute a default,’ in view of the fact that the attorney for the [father] appeared on [his] behalf and requested an adjournment” (Matter of Isaiah H., 61 AD3d 1372, 1373 [2009]; see Matter of David A.A. v Maryann A., 41 AD3d 1300 [2007]; Matter of Shemeco D., 265 AD2d 860 [1999]). “A party who is represented at a scheduled court appearance by an attorney has not failed to appear” (Matter of Sales v Gisendaner, 272 AD2d 997, 997 [2000]).

We therefore reverse the order, grant the objections to the order of the Support Magistrate entered August 16, 2010 and grant the motion to vacate the order of the Support Magistrate entered June 19, 2009, and we remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings on the petition. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.