Gifford v. Commerce Bank
Gifford v. Commerce Bank
92 A.D.3d 539; 938 N.Y.2d 436
Opinion of the Court
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment should have been granted because they demonstrated that they lacked actual or constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition, and plaintiffs decedent’s deposition testimony was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the cleaning contractor caused or created the condition. Concur — Friedman, J.P, Sweeny, Renwick, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.