Daoud v. Daoud
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jarrett v. Jarrett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Jarrett v. Jarrett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Khan-Soleil v. Rashad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Khan-Soleil v. Rashad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Matter of Godfrey v. Bahadeur (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Zina L. v. Eldred L. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Zina L. v. Eldred L. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Tulshi v. Tulshi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Tulshi v. Tulshi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Walsh v. Desroches (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Walsh v. Desroches (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Nunziata v. Nunziata (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The allegations in a family offense proceeding seeking the issuance of an order of protection must be “supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence” (Family Ct Act § 832; see Matter of Aruti v Aruti, 88 AD3d 700, 701 [2011]; Matter of Ungar v Ungar, 80 AD3d 771 [2011]; Matter of Pearlman v Pearlman, 78 AD3d 711, 712 [2010]; Matter of Thomas v Thomas, 72 AD3d 834, 835 [2010]). “Only competent, material and relevant evidence may be admitted in a fact-finding hearing” (Family Ct Act § 834; see Matter of Belinda YY. v Lee ZZ., 74 AD3d 1394, 1395 [2010]).
Here, the evidence submitted in support of the petition consisted solely of inadmissible hearsay. The petitioner therefore
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.