People v. Cancel
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Cohen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Cohen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Franco (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Franco (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Appling (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Shaffer, 81 AD3d 989 [2011]; People v Budden, 77 AD3d 672 [2010]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record, and therefore cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Brewer, 73 AD3d 1199 [2010]). Dillon, J.P, Florio, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.