Linnen v. Prack
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hernandez v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Hernandez v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Matter of Washington v. Howard (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Wright v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Lanfranco v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Lanfranco v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Correnti v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Correnti v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Pooler v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Pooler v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Church v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Church v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Valdez v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Valdez v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Whitted v. New York State Department of Correctional Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Whitted v. New York State Department of Correctional Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Torres v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Torres v. Fischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Initially we find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the hearing was not completed in a timely manner. Excluding the date that the misbehavior report was written (see Matter of Rush v Bezio, 79 AD3d 1548, 1549 [2010]), an extension was obtained within the required 14-day time period and the hearing was concluded within the additional time period granted by the extension (see 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]; Matter of Ifill v Fischer, 72 AD3d 1367, 1368 [2010]). Turning to the merits, the Attorney
Mercure, A.EJ., Lahtinen, Spain, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of making a false statement and providing unauthorized legal assistance and imposed a penalty; petition granted to that extent, the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record and matter remitted to the Commissioner for an administrative redetermination of the penalty on the remaining violation; and, as so modified, confirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.