Linnen v. Prack
Opinion of the Court
Initially we find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the hearing was not completed in a timely manner. Excluding the date that the misbehavior report was written (see Matter of Rush v Bezio, 79 AD3d 1548, 1549 [2010]), an extension was obtained within the required 14-day time period and the hearing was concluded within the additional time period granted by the extension (see 7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [b]; Matter of Ifill v Fischer, 72 AD3d 1367, 1368 [2010]). Turning to the merits, the Attorney
Mercure, A.EJ., Lahtinen, Spain, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of making a false statement and providing unauthorized legal assistance and imposed a penalty; petition granted to that extent, the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner’s institutional record and matter remitted to the Commissioner for an administrative redetermination of the penalty on the remaining violation; and, as so modified, confirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.