In re Tiana N.
Opinion of the Court
The court properly exercised its discretion in imposing probation rather than a conditional discharge. This was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the needs of the community (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The underlying offense was an unprovoked and violent assault in which appellant, along with others, struck the victim with a metal cane, causing injury. In addition, appellant’s school disciplinary and attendance record was poor. Concur— Gonzalez, EJ., Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.