Jacobs, LLP v. Parker
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Halberstam v. Halberstam (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Matter of Janczewski v. Janczewski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Janczewski v. Janczewski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Cohen v. Cohen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Town of Oyster Bay v. 55 Motor Avenue Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Town of Oyster Bay v. 55 Motor Avenue Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Power Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Power Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Sakandar v. American Tr. Ins. Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Delaney v. Roman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- NRT N.Y., LLC v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Matter of Rovner v. Rantzer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- NRT New York, LLC v. Harding (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Gjoni v. Swan Club, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In three related actions, inter alia, to re
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying her motion for the release of certain funds held in escrow.
“[A] written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms” (Greenfield v Philles Records, 98 NY2d 562, 569 [2002]; see MHR Capital Partners LP v Presstek, Inc., 12 NY3d 640, 645 [2009]). Here, the parties’ written escrow agreement clearly enumerates certain conditions to the release of escrow funds. None of those conditions was met.
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.