Erich Fuchs Enterprises v. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Sonkin v. Sonkin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered March 24, 2011, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. The documentary evidence submitted in support of the motion “resolves all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively disposes of the plaintiff [s’] claim” (Fortis Fin. Servs. v Fimat Futures USA, 290 AD2d 383, 383 [2002] [internal quotation marks omitted]). “The court was not required to accept at face value every conclusory, patently unsupportable assertion of fact found in the complaint, but could consider documentary evidence, proved or conceded to be authentic” (West 64th St., LLC v Axis U.S. Ins., 63 AD3d 471 [2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Robinson v Robinson, 303 AD2d 234 [2003]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.