People v. Mungin
Opinion of the Court
The court properly assessed 10 points under the risk factor for forcible compulsion. Even if the initial restraint of the victims was accomplished by deception, the subsequent circumstances of the crime satisfied the definition of forcible compulsion (see Penal Law § 130.00 [8] [b]).
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application for a downward departure (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.