People v. Williams
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Frith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Dash (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Dash (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), dated April 14, 2009, which, after a hearing, inter alia, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In establishing a defendant’s appropriate risk level under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C), the People bear the burden of proving the facts supporting the determination by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Williams, 90 AD3d 880, 881 [2011]; People v Crandall, 90 AD3d 628, 629 [2011]). Here, the People satisfied their burden of adducing facts in support of the assessment of 20 points under risk factor 3 (number of victims) by
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the County Court correctly designated the defendant a level three sex offender. Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.