State ex rel. Greenwald v. Schriro
Opinion of the Court
After reviewing the entire record and considering the factors set forth in CPL 510.30 (2) (a), we find that the amount of bail set by the trial court was unreasonable and an abuse of discretion, and that, taking into account the risk of petitioner’s flight, bail in the reduced amount indicated is sufficient to ensure petitioner’s attendance (see e.g. People ex rel. Robinson v Warden, 135 AD2d 421 [1987]). Among other factors, we note that notwithstanding the notoriety of this case, petitioner is charged with a class D, nonviolent felony and she has no criminal record. In addition, she is a long-term resident of Orange County, is married, and is the mother of four children, including a nine-year-old child, who are United States citizens. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.