Muriqi v. Charmer Industries Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about October 24, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim as against defendant P & P denied P & P’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the section 240 (1) claim against it, and granted defendant/third-party plaintiff Charmer’s cross motion for summary judgment on its claim of common-law indemnification against P & P unanimously modified, on the law, to deny Charmer’s cross motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Charmer, however, should not have been granted summary judgment on its claim for common-law indemnification against P & P since it made no showing that P & P was actively negligent, or that P & P exercised actual supervision or control over plaintiff’s work (see McCarthy v Turner Constr., Inc., 17 NY3d 369, 378 [2011]; Naughton v City of New York, 94 AD3d 1, 10 [2012]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.