People v. Cruz
Opinion of the Court
— Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, and a new trial is ordered.
For the reasons stated in our decision on the codefendant’s appeal (see People v Vargas, 89 AD3d 771 [2011]), that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence should have been granted. Contrary to the People’s contention, the error in admitting the physical evidence was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.