Haque v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Berthold v. Williams (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Berthold v. Williams (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Nahshal v. Chait (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Salcedo v. MTA-New York City Tr. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Perez v. Dixon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants failed to adequately address the plaintiffs claim that as a result of the subject accident, he sustained certain psychological injuries constituting a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Krayn v Torella, 40 AD3d 588 [2007]; see generally Kranis v Biederbeck, 83 AD3d
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see Krayn v Torella, 40 AD3d at 588). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.