Senior v. Fischer
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Al-Matin v. Prack (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- White v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- White v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- De La Cruz v. Bezio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- De La Cruz v. Bezio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
As relevant here, petitioner was found guilty after a tier III disciplinary hearing of attempted smuggling, attempted possession of drugs and violating facility visiting procedures. He thereafter commenced this proceeding challenging the determination, and we confirm. Contrary to his contention, the misbehavior report, testimony from the investigating correction officer, the positive test results for cocaine and marihuana of the substances surrendered by petitioner’s visitor, and confidential evidence provide substantial evidence to support the deter
We are also unpersuaded by petitioner’s procedural objections. Any alleged errors in the prehearing assistance were remedied by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Martino v Goord, 38 AD3d 958, 959 [2007]). Petitioner further contends that the Hearing Officer impermissibly delayed by one day in seeking an extension of time to begin the hearing. Even if true, however, “the regulatory time limits are directory, not mandatory,” and petitioner has demonstrated no prejudice as a result of that minimal delay (see Matter of Mackie v Goord, 49 AD3d 952, 953 [2008]).
Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and, to the extent they are properly before us, found to be without merit.
Mercure, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.