Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 13, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1164; 950 N.Y.S.2d 602
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1980, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, EJ., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.